Socratic’s Rating
Financial Health of the School
Acceptance rates at top colleges
Strength and Character of Leadership
Filings Against the School and Public Complaints
Number of years the school has been operating.
School’s adherence to Stated Culture and Values
Total Enrollment
Average Student to Teacher Ratio
4 students accepted to Ivy League schools from the class of 2023
Discover what others have to say about
Francis W. Parker School
Anonymous
Position, Company name
Parent
Position, Company name
Alumnus and Parent
Position, Company name
Student
Position, Company name
Student
Position, Company name
Student
Position, Company name
Read reviews from students, parents, and teachers about their experiences with local schools.
Parent
See what people are saying about private schools in your area.
Trusted by
—Molly Hunt
Parent, Chicago, IL
Find answers to frequently asked questions to help you navigate our site and understand our school ratings.
You can use our search feature to locate a specific school by name. You can also search by location to view our ranked list of schools in that particular area. By searching in this way you will view the schools in descending rank from best to worst.
Socratic’s rating system has two parts: an overall rating out of 5 and individual category ratings out of 10. Using a 1-10 scale for individual categories allows for more nuance and flexibility in rating and makes the 5 star rating a more complete rating. Once individual category ratings are determined the school receives a score out of a possible 50 points which is then divided by 10 to determine their overall rating.
These individual categories and their criteria are as follows:
Financial Health: Socratic assigns a rating based on the financial information in a school’s tax returns. A tax return clearly illustrates the school’s reliance upon fundraising and donors, their involvement with outside businesses via investing, as well as their fiscal responsibility. Socratic believes this information is closely linked to how a school operates culturally as well as how decisions are made that can effect students’ and parents’ experiences at the school. We look at this information because it can help answer the question: Who does the school value?
Leadership: This rating is based upon the current head of the school’s length of tenure and number of years overall in a leadership position in education. Additionally complaints, investigations and/or lawsuits involving either the school or leader themselves both at their current school as well as at former schools while they were in charge are taken into consideration.
Lawsuits and Complaints: When determining this rating Socratic uses court records searches and news sources to determine if there have been any lawsuits and/or complaints brought against the school or its leadership.
School Culture: Socratic bases this rating upon whether the stated culture/mission statement of the school is adhered to. This is determined by referring to the lawsuits and complaints section as well as all available journalism referencing the perceptions of the school and whether these align with how the school presents itself.
Acceptance Rates at Top Colleges: College acceptance information is reported and available on most school websites. Socratic takes the number of Ivy League Acceptances and the size of the senior graduating class and determines the percentage of Ivy acceptance to determine this rating. . When unreported or in the case of elementary and middle school education this is not taken into consideration when rating the school.
Socratic uses a synthesis of pure data to determine ratings for each school. Our ratings are not crowd-sourced so cannot be review-bombed or gamified to manipulate results. Although you can view user-submitted comments and reviews of schools we do not use this information to determine our rating or the rank of the school.
Because our ratings are data-driven and carefully determined using bias-free research we believe they are more reliable than sites where ratings are determined by reviews of interested parties. Face it, no one bothers to review something unless they feel very strongly about it. These types of ratings are loaded with bias. Socratic believes that facts should be the basis of a rating, not emotion.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Have questions or need support? Get in touch with us.